Those were the watershed years pinpointed by CFN (Catholic Family News; and yes, they are on Facebook! But don't look for it online however; they don't post their entire newspaper online- ever!) in their latest edition, which heavily criticizes the decision by the Pope to celebrate a mass jointly with Lutheran leaders in commemoration of the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther's Reformation on October 31st 2017 by likening it to ''celebrating an apocalyptic plague'' - no less. While it is all in good faith (!) to demonize in such a virulent manner the beginning of such a rift within Christianity -schism that has never ceased to grow since and that the Virgin Mary lamented in such passionate ways as well, reputedly stating ''woe to he who created separation within the Church'' which does not bode well for Martin Luther's soul at all right there; but let God be His Judge- one has got to wonder, though, if all this isn't just detracting from other, truer and deeper problems...
For the Virgin Mary has spoken far more often of conversion of the souls, of prayer (most notably of the Rosary) and of Russia... as of Immaculate Conception, also. But we are talking about CFN - not Fatima.org here (although they are both of them, on the same side - no schism there, no.)
1517 was the beginning of a huge problem, absolutely; we see it now more than ever in 2017, where tentative unity is attempted and met by scorn and repulsion, such as this seen in CFN print...
Never mind that Lutheranism adheres to Sola Gratia, Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura - three very solid roads to the Light right there! However, one could argue that by focusing on God's Grace, one's own Faith (in the sense of general belief, perhaps) and the Scriptures' Truth, Old and New Testaments at once, one may not have... Christ, who is The Way, The Redemption and The Life.
Aye - we're the kind of Christians that tend to lean on
the other two ''SOLAS'' there:
SOLO CHRISTO, especially!
1717 saw the birth of secret societies - perhaps. They existed before that, truly; but this was the first time it was a ''not-so secret'' one! Secret but out in the open; an elite, and proud of it, in other words.
And then we have the beginning of troubles of another kind with the rise of Communism in 1917, the year in which the Virgin appears at Fatima, Portugal, coincidentally enough; a year rife with events of all manners, from epic battles to explosions and calamities - but, truly, there are no coincidences, of course. Our adversary to us all, the deceiver in chief, was mad as hell - see...?
But aren't there glaring omissions on this short list here... or what?
And it isn't just 1617 either - as the same old shenanigans went on in Royal Courts throughout Europe (most notably in France, giving the throne to Louis XIII) while the wretched Ottoman Empire thrived and innocents (a saint, Rose of Lima, in Peru, and seven women inFinspång, Sweden, most notably) died. The latter seven were accused of witchcraft; very few, if any true witches were ever burned at the stake for having dabbled in darkness, let it be known if it truly isn't already. The true devil-worshipers pay for their crimes against God and their fellow man only in the afterlife. Most likely it was around those years (1600s all the way through the 1800s, verily) that the various dark sources (and resources) were put together into one single book which is reputedly the end-all, be-all of all grimoires for those who would dabble in the occult... A Scandinavian source claims to harken as far back as 1529, though; with a 3rd Century author, why not. Whatever it is, the collected tome is not fit for reading and one should go all out Fahrenheit 451 on its sorry rear - all editions of it.
What about 1817-1818 - epidemics like never before (cholera, from Bengal to Calcutta; typhus in Scotland, notably. Even the New World got its share; before and after too) were seen reaching more than ever before seen in history too; the direct result of some empires' expansionism and blind ambition (looking at you, ''Great'' Britons... Spaniard bastards, too... the Portuguese were part of this as well, granted...) and so they had to bring forth all of that - plus their germs, to the four corners of the world known to them, back then! There were fairly impressive earthquakes in Greece and Italia in those years, too; old school Christianity used to believe that when the Earth trembled it was because God Wasn't Happy with us. And for good reason too! Plenty of reasons, actually; how about one that tops the list, for starters? Since the very beginning: we rebelled. And the spirit of rebellion spreads, too, just like an epidemic, just like a disease: as those are the years of the Great Rebellion in Sri Lanka. We've just come off the Secession in the Americas... And in Copenhagen, Denmark, the army is necessary to quell the largest riot they'd ever seen in a prison - that was in June of 1817.
We also have all of the preceding landmark anno domini...
1417 - the 206th Pope was elected, in November, following the preceding pope's abdication; the devil had already been in Rome behind the scenes, for several centuries... Restoration, rather than reformation, in England as King Henry V begins undoing the Norman Conquest, finally... Meanwhile, the Romanians were having trouble with the damnable Ottoman Empire; the voivode of Wallachia couldn't do a thing...
1317 - Civil war in Sweden and Finland. King Birger of Sweden was a jerk. And the Great Famine ended that year - wasn't that God's Punishment, or what? It had started in 1315... Perhaps it was the devil's machinations though; what better way to turn them away from God, at this point in time, then to test them through untold strife and desolation?
1217 - Year of the Fifth Crusade - as it culminates and reaches the Holy Land. Mongols go wild in North China and Islam is spreading, also, but back in Europe, Portugal is handing the Islamic caliphate a crucial defeat in Alcácer do Sal - it is all part of the Reconquista, ridding the Iberian peninsula of the islamic presence which has been there since the 8th Century. Chalk one up for King Afonso II, rei do Portugal. Church and State are one as it isPope Honorius III who crowns the new emperor of the Crusade-leading Latin Empire of Constantinople - in Rome.
1117 - territorial conflicts blossom all over the place - as the devil relishes the symbiosis between church and state, religion and politics - faith and earthly power! Most distressing of all of these conflicts is the (mercifully brief) annoyance of seeing the Almoravids (raving arabic lunatics from Morocco) returning to Coimbra, cultured focal point in Portugal...
1017 - England is split into four as, for a Christmas gift, Eadric Streona has his head chopped off! Again, the histrionics of the power-mad royals of yesteryear... Islam was torn into pieces as well, as there was internal conflict against the Zirid dynasty (not my kind of Dynasty) in Tunisia...
17 B.C. until 917 A.D. --- the building of the Church! If all heathen observers lament the virtual absence of historical evidence of Christianity's foundation (what, with no records of deemed ''historical worth'' of even The Christ's passage on Earth, let alone his Apostles' testimonials, other than their very own Gospels... Without even a mention of the Shroud of Turin's existence before the late 1300s; lest one believes it bore a different name and was folded differently for the longest time... Even archeological digs and findings are refuted by the unbelievers!) it certainly should befall Christians (Catholics, on top of that, who pride themselves to be the ones with the one true Church built upon the Rock who is Peter, first de facto Pope...!) to underline the activities of Tertullian, Paul and all the First Christians who founded what they sit on right now - on top of Jesus The Christ and Peter themselves, obviously! The fact that they missed a golden opportunity to juxtapose the ''all-important reformation'' with the ''founding blocks'' of the One True Faith... is sad! After all, ''ML'' only pointed out what he thought was off-base with the way Christians went about things with regards to their faith; pointing out that he was just a pedantic nitpicker (just like a German to...) and that he doesn't even come close to measuring up with his elders; that he isn't a founding father of anything, unlike them, even the smallest of them all... it would have been great.
A t-shirt with just a couple of names
(all right, technically, there are three - happy?)
citing what is evident would have been... priceless,
If the goal was to prove ''ML'' was way off the mark, why not? Maybe others mentioned it, in passing: 100HuntleySt... Faith Today? Or, perhaps, any one of the various and numerous denominational publications out there... The Adventists? The Mormons? The Witnesses?!?
But it is doubtful, actually! Hence, notch up another one for this Luminous Manifesto: the only one who dared elevate Tertullian, one of the very first Christians ever, past the pride of Eisleben!
(((We'll purposefully skip the years 317 and 417 here - for obvious reasons!)))
(And we'll leave you the pleasure of going through years 17 A.D. through 217 A.D. - and then 517 all right on through the year 1000... if you so choose! Wikipedia is there for *you*... Although I still stick to my Encarta -imagine that- and my old history books!)
Here's a fine history book for ya, folks...!
Catholic Family News obviously has it against both the Freemasons and the (Luminous?) Lutherans (for the reasons cited above) - and Communists deserve everything they get, certainly. However, accusing those three sources of trouble of all the woes of the world is too simplistic; there are many, many forces at work in the daily chaos out there; there are a great many factors at play and it isn't even fair to attempt to trace them all back to the devil itself, either! Man has shown his capacity to be evil all by his lonesome self - and he deserves some of the credit as of the blame, too!
The devil is simply too happy that some of his handiwork emulates God's Creation as well - it proliferates, expands and multiplies, all on its own...
Catholic Family News is not available for subscription online: you will have to write in the old-fashioned way, in order to subscribe. Keep the mailman happy - won't you?
The wrongest trend of thought analyzes PROPHECY...
There is this would-be viral video consisting of pseudo-historical study that attempts to convince you that ancient prophecy is nothing more than a succession of rewrites adapted to the whims and taste of the latest omnipresent culture...
Zeitgeist tries to tell all myths are the same - and that, basically, the Promise God Made to humanity is but a fairy tale? Such a conclusion can only come from the small minds that have still not fully assimilated the Reason why Jesus made the sacrifice that He Made. These small minds have also never seen the evidence around them that proves not only that God Exists, but that His Promise was meant to come in the form of A Son, not the sun but since He Created ALL THINGS, He certainly could leave clues, signs, visible manifestations in His Creation of the Way things would progress - spiritually! The small minds behind this "zeitgeist" do not see any of that; they do not even see the hand of the adversary in all of their accumulated "evidence" - nor do they see the evidence of the adversary's very existence, all about us... Heck - they do not even mention him at all, being such apt instruments of his machinations, here:
Horus, Attis, Krishna, Dionysus (!), Mithra, Odin, Baal (!!!), Adonis, Prometheus of Caucasus, the Divine Teacher of Plato and all the rest "susbscribe to these general characteristics" - BUT NONE OF THEM FULFILLED PROPHECY QUITE THE WAY JESUS DID.
For none of them had a PURPOSE TO THEIR DEATH AND RESURRECTION quite like Jesus Did!
The Way Is The Messiah, The Christ - and He Died for the sins of humanity.
Did Horus do that? Did Krishna do that? Did Dionysus do that?!?
For crying out loud, people - Baal is the name of a demon! How can you not see the IMPOSTURE here? The IMITATION - of what was known -by the adversary- TO BE COMING...
It takes too much foresight, too many brain cells, too much imagination - DOES IT?
An adversary that exists since the dawn of time and is privy to all the details of The Plan - would he not plant misinformation, all manners of it, along the way, in order to discredit The One, when He Did finally Come to Earth...?
Wouldn't it be *your* strategy?
Now, if you think to discredit this entire scenario by targeting the very existence of such an adversary -the devil; you realized who we were talking about here all along, right- disengage that process immediately.
Because *you know* he exists.
Evidence is even more irrefutable that evil exists, that the evil one exists - than the evidence of a Creator and of His Plan for our redemption.
For we are unworthy.
That we have allowed the adversary to influence us so much throughout the ages, despite our knowledge of his existence, is unforgivable.
Yet - Our Lord, Creator of all, gives us a chance.
And, of course, the adversary (known by so many names, one of which is Baal indeed) wants nothing more than ruin our chances there - any chances that we might have in life, verily...
The Chance of Redemption - most especially.
Seems like he -the adversary- succeeded in effectively ruining any chance that the guy(s) behind this zeitgeist thing might have had - ever. In their efforts to piece something together, they analyzed everything wrong and created correlation where they had to see fabrication - but to see that, they required imagination, which they horrendously lacked. They wanted to piece together characteristics particular to a period of time: yet they fail to see how disjointed it all is, for it is not a single time that they are analyzing but several eras of paganism flavored with mere hints of the truth. This is not the "spirit of the time" at all - it is merely a tapestry of many abominations through the ages that are known to have been transvestiting the Known Prophecy of the Coming of a Messiah; and to fall for such a plethora of false messiahs (and there will be more before the True Messiah Returns) is pathetic indeed.
DO NOT BE LIKE THESE UNIMAGINATIVE IDIOTS.
I say to you today - BELIEVE.
You will not be deceived, nor disappointed.
You will be Saved.
In the venerable Portuguese language, "sorte" is the word designating luck - not the opposite. In the venerable Italian language, the word is "fortuna" - delineating at the same time some sort of riches accumulated, even if in the intangible, when one is "lucky" in this world. Whether one wishes thee "boa sorte" or "buon fortuna" it is certain that they are wishing you the best of luck in your overall endeavours. So that, as the French, now, would say, you might "améliorer votre sort" which means "better your fate" - hence, the words "luck" and "fate" are linked in more ways than one. However, since we are now dabbling in French, there should be made a mention at this time of the expression "mauvais sort" - which designates something else entirely... and leads us to the heart of the matter here. Indeed, "le mauvais sort" is equivalent to the evil eye, more than anything else. It is evidently the absolute opposite of the Portuguese "sorte" and would be hard-pressed to bring anyone "buon fortuna" either...
With all that linguistic knowledge, now, you may appreciate as I did the following, observed online on these early days of 2009...
Now, if one truly masters the French language, one has to be a tiny wee bit puzzled by this sentence/title... Because, logically, you can be the MASTER of your fate (as in the expression "maîtres de leur propre sort" or 'de leur destinée' for example) or you can be the victim of fate itself when things go awry, awfully awry - but to be the victim of your own fate implies the impossible; self-inflicted evil eye? Someone who should NEVER look in the mirror, thus... Think about it and look at it this way: one's worst enemy would be... oneself? How utterly fascinating and true - most times, but not all the time, no... For, here, there is but one or two cases in which self-sabotage can truly be invoked.
The list of people who would have been so misguided as to cause their own misfortune includes first and foremost one Jocelyne Wildenstein (aka "the catwoman" of plastic surgery and high society alike) but also a large number of artists and thespians: Hunter Tylo, Tori Spelling, Mickey Rourke, Cher, Michael Jackson of course, even Beyoncé herself - to whom we must add the name of a former top model (Kate Moss) and that of a fashionista: Donatella Versace. Each and every one of these has, indeed, 'done it to themselves' pretty much - but can they be blamed for that?
The French language does have its own brand of sarcasm, evidently - and, here, "victimes de leur propre sort" implies that all these individuals have become victimized by their very own fault as much as their status of being rich, immensely wealthy even, truly famous and, thus, privileged enough to be able to afford 1001 unnecessary surgeries, for example... I might be exagerrating, evidently, but M.J. and that catwoman, alone, have raised the average considerably - but that is not the point right now.
The point is this: for these cases, and quite a few more just like them, to always be repertoriated among the gainfully overrated and adulated of this world, is evidence enough that it is absolutely true that they become the victims of their own set of privileges. Those few individual members of the elite have, indeed, self-destructed in a rampant display of many types of self-absorbed abuses. The same sad results are obtained in every other strata of society, though - much less publicized and much less spectacular or obvious, but still every bit as perplexing, if not exactly as avoidable as these could have been... However, could it be that someone else's influence could have played a factor here, too? It could be true, for at least a few of the cases here and, to a greater degree, for many others, much lesser known ones.
It is undeniable that so many do it to themselves indeed: but many are pushed that way, also, by seen, obvious influences as much as by unseen, really not-so evident ones. And no - I am not talking about any pathetic examples of devastating drug use, self-mutilation, mere peer pressure or other mundane abominations of our modern world - no, I do not mean any of those here - not this time.
The worst of the worst of these things can be observed only by the most aware pair of eyes; and only those eyes can see, spot these one-in-a-million cases and tell them apart from all the other self-inflicted victims of their very own twisted fate or "victimes de leur propre sort" cases...
For not everyone is their own worst enemy - some become it when goaded into that by others; and that is not peer pressure, that is being manipulated in the most machiavellian way - such a way that leads to one's self-destruction (or self-derision) all for the amusement of the other, whom one could have considered a friend, at first. And then there are the most insidious cases of all, those unlucky individuals who see their appearance transform itself over the years, without any apparent reason, rhyme or reason. Transformations that stun as much as Rourke's bloatedness (be it Mickey's or Heather O'Rourke's - we'll differenciate in a second) and Jocelyne's turn for the worst (Wildenstein getting so "wilde" that immediate comparisons to Frankenstein were inevitable - at pretty much any public appearance that she's been making ever since, poor her.)
These sort of transformations, supposedly "all natural" or voluntarily orchestrated in the most artificial and plastic way, are anything but simply that, in either possible case, sometimes...
The little girl from Poltergeist, Heather O'Rourke, became so bloated going into her teens she looked like a little old lady rather than a typical teenager. That was not natural nor normal. That was not her will or due to her own doing, either. Many theories about it have circulated, reinforced by the fact that she died shortly thereafter. She got misdiagnosed and mistreated by a team of doctors, as it so often happens, her condition worsened and she was overworked when what she really needed was to be prescribed some rest...? That is quite possible. Or, as the other popular theory has it, the ghosts had taken a likeness to the movies' storyline and enacted it in real life, with the movie's main protagonist herself... Now, is that possible?
Yes, it is possible too.
Why is it possible - and how?
Because - the world of the invisible is so vast, much more so than the tangible, physical, material world.
The spiritual world is everywhere - if you accept the fact that life energy does not evaporate when physical death occurs; because no energy simply dissipates - that is proven.
You have no idea how vast it is - and what horrors it contains.
For a "monster" in our world is someone who committed horrible acts, usually - yet he or she remains basically coated up in a human shell, not a horribly disfigured shell at all. Woe to those who dub "monsters" those who have become disfigured physically due to some accident or crippling illness. The true monsters are wolves in sheep's clothing; never just forget that overnight nor feign to have forgotten it.
Monsters such as Jeffrey Dahmer and Andrei Chikatilo, for example, remained physically pleasant to the eye, despite the accumulation of heinous acts that they had perpetrated. Dahmer is a telling example indeed. If you didn't know what he'd done, you would like him best over any number of genuine good guys who happened to lack the charm, the dash, the suave quality that Dahmer could be deemed to have in spades.
And yet his soul was and is the most horrible creature that anyone could behold - if you could see into the spiritual world, that is...
Can I see into the spiritual world, you ask? Not that I'm aware of, no...
But I have imagination - and as Einstein said it, it is greater than knowledge.
I also have knowledge though: the knowledge that there is a spiritual world. The knowledge that death is not the end. The knowledge that the other side is greatly affecting our side of reality each and every day of our lives. The knowledge that, sometimes, we do behold tiny bits of glimpses from that other side, we do see what is beyond - we simply do not know what we are seeing...
Glenn Burnie, Maryland resident Patricia Bean died of a brain hemorrhage a mere ten months after finally moving out of a certifiably haunted house where she, her two sons, her daughter, her husband, her second spouse and her beloved pet all went literally through hell.
For, aside from hearing strange noises in the house, and having witnessed various other alarming manifestations and poltergeist activity, there were very soon indeed far more troubling events there; the husband's behaviour changed almost overnight - he was a gentle, caring man who became overbearing, violent and abusive from one day to the next. He then vanished and never resurfaced again. In that, there is a first parallel with a case I have first-hand knowledge of; the husband was attached to the abode and would impede a move at all costs, for various reasons. And then, he was the first to leave there, too - because he died, from a massive stroke. In the case of Patty Bean's husband, he was also the first to leave the house that he stubbornly insisted his entire family remain in - even though his wife and kids all felt uneasy there from day one - but he left by mysteriously disappearing, not the same as the case I have first-hand knowledge of, at all. One may imagine he simply escaped, relatively unharmed, the cursed abode in question. He had left for a walk one night, after dinner, and simply never returned. His disappearance remains unsolved after all these years and his whereabouts are totally unknown since that night. It is as if the devil took him off the face of the earth...
Patricia Bean remained in the house due to her financial situation afterwards - even though she was terrified of it. She heard footsteps in the house, at day and at night - and so did her two sons. Her daughter had fled the home, getting married at sixteen in order to never have to live there again. In Patty's daughter's own words, "the boyfriend didn't matter - I just wanted to get out of that house." And she did, marrying far too young, the first one that came along... Patty would remain terrified for years, living in that house with her two youngest sons from that point on. One night, the ghost of a horribly scarred man came to her bed and tried to strangle her. She felt the ghostly hands around her neck, as she could no longer breathe. And then it eased its grip on her and let her live. For some unfathomable reason, it had effectively "allowed her to stay" both among the living and in the house, if only for a while longer... One day, though, she felt unwell and her eldest boy called his big sister on the phone, for help. The daughter reluctantly returned to that home to be of any assistance she could be and wound up having to call an ambulance - Patricia Bean had suffered a mild stroke.
From that day onward, Patricia would never again be the same woman she had been before moving into that house. After coming out of the hospital, she didn't listen to her own mother and displayed her own brand of stubbornness now in relation to that home, electing to stay there despite everything that had been happening. Once again, similarities with the case that I am aware of on a first-hand basis arise: after the husband's death, in which case we have the wife becoming "attached" to the abode she had once wanted so ardently to leave forevermore, simply because her husband had lived there for so long. Self-imposed financial restraint also playing a factor, however it was the wish of the widow to simply die where her husband had practically died too. The exact same thing as what happened to Patricia Bean, in a way - only with even more tragic consequences, given that there are two demises instead of one. (And in the Patricia Bean case, we haven
Patricia eventually met a new love interest, a handyman who came to make repairs to the house, and she began a timid relationship with him that quickly blossomed. This man was a believer - and on a particular day that he was working outside the house, he saw the ghost of a woman standing in a window right in front of him. He was so close that he could clearly see that it was not Patricia at all but someone else - so he went back inside to inquire about who she might be. It didn't look to be Patricia's mother either, whom he had met before. Alas, the ghastly looking woman had disappeared when he came into the house to see who was really there... On another occasion, at night, after he had spent the night with Patricia, all seemed well and blissful until the two lovers shook off the cobwebs and truly woke up to find the family pet's fur all over them - but UNDERNEATH THE BEDCOVERS. There was dog fur all over the house too - especially in the bathroom and all over the sink in there. For the next two weeks, neighbors helped look for the family's beloved pet dog - and it was never to be found again either. The dead who resided in that house had claimed a second victim, it seemed. They had their sights set on a third: Patricia herself.
Even when her new man pleaded for her to leave that house, Patricia would have none of it. He managed to convince her to summon a priest's help, in order to bless the house - at least that. It actually made matters worse. The spirits in that house went into a frenzy like never before - this time, the poltergeist activity was such that, as all in the family were in danger of physical injury, Patricia finally agreed to leave that house, on the spot.
Ten months later, she was dead.
Her son, Billy Bean (not to be confused with the gay baseball player nor the actor) is scarred for life - but even he has not added two plus two in that tragic story.
For he hadn't realized that it was that very same evil spirit that resided in the house, who had tried to harm his mother several times and clearly had it against her from the very beginning, the evil spirit that had terrorized them all - it was that spirit that had killed his mother in the end too, despite the move. The evil spirit caused her first stroke and later her fatal brain hemorrhage.
This is exactly what happened to the other case I mentioned, the one I have ''first-hand knowledge'' of - only it happened to the man instead of the woman, in that case.
For the dead can affect the living - in far more insidious ways than merely causing a heart attack when they spook someone through materializing unexpectedly right in front of them. The dead can cause fatalities. One has to realize several more things, too: the dead outnumber the living in such a way that we hardly stand a fighting chance in a haunting case like this; a single evil spirit such as this one, clinging on to a material place, could attract many more spirits, creating a very unhealthy place for the living, especially those that are naturally sensitive to such things, which seemed to be the case for Patricia Bean. She was literally attacked by all sides - and totally blindsided too. The mysterious intricacies of the unseen's effects on the tangible are, alas, not well-documented; the inability of the medical establishment to accurately explain how things such as strokes, aneurysms and similar "accidents" happen imply that unseen factors are at work there indeed... ALL OF THAT and more is already indicative that there is a correlation there and that we do not comprehend what forces are causing all these things. In Patricia Bean's case, as with many others, the evidence points at the true source of these forces and their more than likely nefarious effects upon the living: and this is the revengeful dead, full of bitterness towards the living who occupy their erstwhile living space now, have ample motive there - that is for sure. So much so that they will hasten the living's departure from this world - forcing their victims to effectively join their ranks in the process... Misery loves company, don't you know?
In the Glenn Burnie, MARYLAND case, the evidence is undeniable: for the house was not the only one haunted on the block either. In fact, the whole block was haunted - many residents had gone through very similar frightening experiences, none as tragic as Patricia Bean's but all very traumatic nonetheless. A retired policeman who used to patrol that very neighbourhood before the Beans moved in, mister John Romine, was interested in further researching the subject and publishing a book about it - and he is the one who told Billy what had really gone on there for all these long years... All of these houses had been built on the site of an old military camp - one where many soldiers had died miserably. The ghost Patricia had seen trying to strangle her was identified eventually (because of his scarred face) as being most probably Edward Zipprian, an infantry trooper who had maimed himself while using the faulty equipment at the disposal of the troops back in his day... Alas for her, Patty was evidently more ''attuned'' to such ethereal things than the rest of the neighbourhood, making her a prime target not only for a troubled soul such as Zipprian's but all the others who were not resting in peace as well. And it is my personal theory that too many of such ''contacts', can and should cause things such as strokes and the like.
The ghostly woman though, seen by both Patricia's new love interest and her son Billy, remains a total and complete mystery, even as to why she was even there...
My theory is that she was an otherworldly observer; maybe even a past victim of this haunting as well who, just like Patricia Bean did, lost her own life in the process... It is after all more than probable that the victims' spirits "hang around" the material world too - why should it be exclusively the evil disgruntled ones, mad at their own fate and prone to take it out on every innocent that happens to come by down the pike...? No - it is not just them who stick around longer than they should - and we can thank God for that.
Born in the Age of Aquarius, destined to seek out truths in many an art form, trained as a historian and a journalist but truly a prose-lover... Luciano is out to dispel any clichés and reinvent them all both to the tune of a little something called the truth as also to his own image - and being old-fashioned, he does not mind that distinction one infinitesimal tiny bit at all...! "There are two ways to spread the light; be the candle... or the mirror that reflects It." I have chosen to be the latter... okay? ~*~
"To be not only a seeker of light... but a dream weaver of light" ~*~ For as surely as the moon reflects the light from the sun, you and I can reflect the Light from Above - and be, indeed, the light of this world! ~*~*~*~ NOTE: THERE ARE COOKIES ~ from at least three parties~ ON ALL OF MY BLOGS! ~*~ accept it!
